- Home
- /
- How we rate
How we evaluate: sources, conditions and tests
We give no scores. We publish verifiable facts and, when we have them, our own test results. This is the process.
Our protocol for future tests
We have not performed real-money tests yet. Each future test will include its date, amount, method and screenshots.
Three evidence levels
What each mark means and what it cannot claim.
What the operator states in terms or help pages. A promise, not an outcome.
Shown with source link and date. Never rounded or filled in with assumptions.
The operator’s statement was reopened and confirmed by a second reviewer, on a noted date.
Contradictions on the same page are flagged as such and excluded from comparisons.
This label will identify real-money tests with a date, amount and duration. We have not performed our own tests yet.
One test = one withdrawal. We never generalise a single test into an “average time”.
What we publish about a casino
- A confirmed official domain and a public help or terms page in Romanian.
- At least one withdrawal condition independently verified by a second reviewer.
- Every fact with a source link, retrieval date and evidence level.
- A completed “Limitations and problems” section, even when uncomfortable.
What we never do
- We do not invent scores, stars or an “average withdrawal time” without tests.
- We do not treat a payment-method logo as proof it works in the cashier.
- We do not blend the operator’s promise with our own test result.
- We publish no AggregateRating structured data and never sort by commission.